Talk 1 – Could poor dose selection in fundamental neuroscience underlie the failure to translate findings from bench to bedside?

9.40am – 10.10am BST, 23 September 2025 ‐ 30 mins

Morning Session: Setting the Scene – Expert Perspectives

There are many challenges facing neuroscience researchers when using pharmacological manipulations in animal models and deciding on what is an ‘appropriate dose’. It is generally acknowledged that studies in animals require an adjustment to the human clinical dose to reflect species differences in the pharmacokinetics of the drugs. However, in a recent systematic review of the literature relating to antidepressant drugs and their use in rodent models, we found a wide range of doses being used and often doses which were >10 times greater than would be used in the clinic.

These higher doses tend to also use routes of administration e.g. intraperitoneal, which achieve higher acute plasma concentrations than the oral route more commonly found clinically. Most publications referred to previous literature to justify their dose selection and tested only a single dose in their model. This widespread practice in neuroscience research poses significant challenges for translational research particularly when these drugs are being used to ask questions about underlying mechanisms. In this talk I will consider current practises in fundamental neuroscience research and why poor dose selection may limit the translational relevance of the mechanisms and novel drug targets identified.

I will also discuss whether the lack of development of more clinically relevant behavioural readouts for preclinical psychiatry is compounding the issues, and the importance of considering the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics of the drug in both the study design and data interpretation.