Contents |
The BNA is committed towards equal opportunities and non-discriminatory procedures and practices throughout its work.
The BNA strives to avoid biases of any kind across membership, allocation of funding, print and online publications, and access to conferences and events, and also when engaged in the employment of staff and election of council and committee members.
The BNA actively seeks to eliminate any unlawful discrimination or bias related to age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage or civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, sexual orientation or any combination of these. Discrimination on any of these grounds is unlawful under the Equality Act 2010. The BNA further seeks to eliminate any less favourable treatment relating to education, socioeconomics or personal situation.
In all of BNA’s activities we are intent on providing equity for all and promoting an inclusive culture.
The BNA formallly endorses the ALBA Declaration on Equity and Inclusion, and works to fulfil its goals.
For the BNA to endorse, fund or participate in a meeting, the expectation is that the meeting will follow the principles of this Equity, Diversity and Inclusion policy, and meet the following conditions:
Most recent review: January 2021
How are we doing? Can we do better? Please let us know if we have slipped up, or if there is anything we could do to improve equity of opportunity or avoid discrimination of any kind, by sending your comments or suggestions for improvements to our Equal Opportunity and Diversity representative via the BNA office at office@bna.org.uk.
In February 2019 the BNA Trustees added the BNA to the list of signatories of DORA, the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment
DORA was developed in 2012, during the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Cell Biology, as a worldwide initiative to encourage development of ways to evaluate research and researchers that - critcially - do not rely on journal impact factors. Instead, DORA is working to gather and share existing examples of good practice in research assessment, including approaches to funding and fellowships, hiring and promotion, and awarding prizes, that emphasize research itself and not where it is published.
1147 organizations have already signed DORA including the Society for Neuroscience, European Journal of Neuroscience, Cancer Research UK, the Company of Biologists, eLIFE, EMBO, PLOS and Wellcome.
We feel that DORA aligns with the BNA’s commitment to credibility and transparency of research, and it is therefore entirely appropriate to be a signatory.
On a practical level, the BNA commits to following the principles of DORA by:
In February 2021, the BNA endorsed the Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers, to complement our existing commitment to DORA.
These principles were developed as part of the 6th World Conference on Research Integrity (held in Hong Kong in 2019), and were created to reinforce the need to reward researchers for specific positive behaviours that promote trustworthy research, such as reproducibility and full reporting of data.
The five principles are:
We believe that these represent an additional approach towards tackling the incentive structure within research, which needs to be directed more towards rewarding researchers that go to efforts to make their work as credible as possible. Find out more about how the BNA and others are putting these into practice.
The BNA supports its members in their use of humane and appropriate animal research for scientific and medical progress when no alternative is available. We believe that research on animals is necessary to gain a fundamental understanding of the nervous system, and for the discovery and development of new products for the diagnosis and treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders.
The BNA is committed to openness on the use of animals in research and is a signatory of the Concordat on Openness on Animal Research in the UK. This Concordat recognises the need to provide the public with transparent and accurate information about the role played by animals in scientific discovery, and the contribution of animal research towards new medical treatments and beyond.
In line with this, the BNA strongly endorses the principles of the 3Rs where every effort must be made to:
The BNA believes that access to, and dissemination of, information about techniques used in fundamental and clinical research is essential to allow everyone to be aware of the reasons why animals are used, and to make informed choices related to the role of animals in neuroscience research.
Most recent review: April 2017
A collaboration between LASA (Laboratory Animal Science Association), BAP (British Association for Psychopharmacology), BNA (British Neuroscience Association) and the ESSWAP Foundation (European Courses in Whole Animal Pharmacology).
These Guidelines are designed to help with the process of making informed decisions about the best way to carry out studies of animal behaviour in biomedical experiments. Although the topics concentrate on laboratory research, some apply to ethological studies in the natural environment as well. Even investigators who need to comply with regulatory requirements (and so cannot modify either the choice of procedure or the design of their studies) need to be aware of the principles described in these Guidelines.
Download the Guidelines at the following link
For regularly updated news on Animal Research, please see the following resources:
Please see information about being refunded for payments made to the BNA at our refund policy page.
